Jacob Champion writes:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:55 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 11:49:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Not sure. Yesterday I saw such warnings from arowana,
>>> boa, dhole, rhinoceros, and shelduck, eg
>> They are all using some gcc 4.X flavor, most with
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:55 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 11:49:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Not sure. Yesterday I saw such warnings from arowana,
> > boa, dhole, rhinoceros, and shelduck, eg
> >
> > arowana | 2025-07-08 04:54:18 | xpath.c:274:6: warning: 'worksp
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 11:49:55AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure. Yesterday I saw such warnings from arowana,
> boa, dhole, rhinoceros, and shelduck, eg
>
> arowana | 2025-07-08 04:54:18 | xpath.c:274:6: warning: 'workspace'
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninit
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:00:39PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also fix a number of places where variables that are assigned to
>> within a PG_TRY and then used after it were not initialized or
>> not marked as volatile. (A few buildfarm members were issuing
>> "may be use
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:00:39PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fix up misuse of "volatile" in contrib/xml2.
>
> Also fix a number of places where variables that are assigned to
> within a PG_TRY and then used after it were not initialized or
> not marked as volatile. (A few buildfarm members were is
