Andres Freund writes:
> On 2019-12-27 08:20:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hm, I am not sure that it is actually that much used, such stuff is
>> very specialized.
> That's true for some of this, but e.g. genam.h is pretty widely
> included. I mean, you had to adapt like 100+ files and while
Hi,
On 2019-12-27 08:20:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:26:51AM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Yea, this seems like a much bigger move than warranted. Especially
> >> without a backward compat header put i
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:26:51AM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Andres Freund wrote:
>> Yea, this seems like a much bigger move than warranted. Especially
>> without a backward compat header put into place.
Hm, I am not sure that it is actually that much used,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> Yea, this seems like a much bigger move than warranted. Especially
> without a backward compat header put into place.
>
> Imo this ought to be reverted.
I agree.
--
Peter Geoghegan
Hi,
On 2019-12-26 11:46:06 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Dec-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > Rename files and headers related to index AM
> >
> > The following renaming is done so as source files related to index
> > access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the
> >
On 2019-Dec-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Rename files and headers related to index AM
>
> The following renaming is done so as source files related to index
> access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the
> original names used for index AMs ware too generic, and could be
> con
