On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:42 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> Pushed an update including the two revs already discussed here, as well as
> ed43677e20369040ca4e50c698010c39d5ac0f47 # 2021-01-19 08:10:13 +0530
> # pgindent worker.c.
Thanks.
> I think a lot of pgindent runs are just to reindent changes d
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2022-03-19 12:36:29 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Ideally there would be some kind of reminder built into the
>> pgindent tooling to make it less likely.
> I think a lot of pgindent runs are just to reindent changes during
> development, so that'd probably just join
Hi,
Pushed an update including the two revs already discussed here, as well as
ed43677e20369040ca4e50c698010c39d5ac0f47 # 2021-01-19 08:10:13 +0530
# pgindent worker.c.
On 2022-03-19 12:36:29 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Ideally there would be some kind of reminder built into the
> pgindent t
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 12:27 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> I was actually wondering what our policy around that is for smaller runs like
> this. Do we do that in bulk occasionally? Just after?
That's not completely clear, but I think that it makes sense to do it
right afterwards. We haven't been mai
On 2022-03-19 12:08:42 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:45 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > pgstat: run pgindent on pgstat.c/h.
>
> Reminder: please add this commit to the .git-blame-ignore-revs file.
I was actually wondering what our policy around that is for smaller runs li
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 11:45 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> pgstat: run pgindent on pgstat.c/h.
Reminder: please add this commit to the .git-blame-ignore-revs file.
--
Peter Geoghegan
