pgsql: Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest

2023-11-08 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429d4, we argued against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that. However, we failed to realize that the messag

pgsql: Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest

2023-11-08 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429d4, we argued against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that. However, we failed to realize that the messag

pgsql: Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest

2023-11-08 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429d4, we argued against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that. However, we failed to realize that the messag

pgsql: Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest

2023-11-08 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429d4, we argued against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that. However, we failed to realize that the messag