pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment

pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment

pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment

pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment

pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment

pgsql: Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check

2025-12-15 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Clarify comment on multixid offset wraparound check Coverity complained that offset cannot be 0 here because there's an explicit check for "offset == 0" earlier in the function, but it didn't see the possibility that offset could've wrapped around to 0. The code is correct, but clarify the comment