Thanks for everyone, pushed. Let us follow the pgbuildfarm
David Steele wrote:
On 3/27/18 10:24 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27
sorry for wrong URL
https://buildfarm.postgresql
On 3/27/18 10:24 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>> Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27
>>
>
> sorry for wrong URL
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27%2013%3A30%3A24
Lo
> "Teodor" == Teodor Sigaev writes:
Teodor> Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
You added two tests to the SKIP: block without updating the number of
tests that would be skipped, so the final count of tests comes out
wrong.
skip "symlinks not supported on Windows", 15 if ($windo
David Steele writes:
> Will do. Probably a path problem, which hopefully I can fix with the new
> function Andrew wrote.
Looks to me more like a failure-to-count-the-number-of-tests
problem. There's no test reported as "not ok".
regards, tom lane
On 3/27/18 10:17 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27
Will do. Probably a path problem, which hopefully I can fix with the new
function Andrew wrote.
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27
sorry for wrong URL
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27%2013%3A30%3A24
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mai
Hm, seems, Windows doesn't like this patch
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-03-27
David, could you have a look?
Teodor Sigaev wrote:
Skip temp tables from basebackup.
Do not store temp tables in basebackup, they will not be visible anyway, so,
there are
Skip temp tables from basebackup.
Do not store temp tables in basebackup, they will not be visible anyway, so,
there are not reasons to store them.
Author: David Steel
Reviewed by: me
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ea4d26a-a453-c1b7-eff9-5a3ef8f8a...@pgmasters.net
Branc
