Fix comments atop ReorderBufferAddInvalidations.
The comments atop seem to indicate that we always accumulate invalidation
messages in a top-level transaction which is neither required nor matches
with the code.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewd by: Masahiko Sawada
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was i
Fix comments atop ReorderBufferAddInvalidations.
The comments atop seem to indicate that we always accumulate invalidation
messages in a top-level transaction which is neither required nor matches
with the code.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewd by: Masahiko Sawada
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was i
Fix comments atop ReorderBufferAddInvalidations.
The comments atop seem to indicate that we always accumulate invalidation
messages in a top-level transaction which is neither required nor matches
with the code.
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewd by: Masahiko Sawada
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was i
Re-allow building on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013.
In commit 450ee7012 I supposed that all platforms we now care about have
snprintf(), since that's required by C99. Turns out that Microsoft did
not get around to adding that until VS2015. We've dropped support for
VS2013 as of HEAD (cf 6203583b7
Re-allow building on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013.
In commit 450ee7012 I supposed that all platforms we now care about have
snprintf(), since that's required by C99. Turns out that Microsoft did
not get around to adding that until VS2015. We've dropped support for
VS2013 as of HEAD (cf 6203583b7
Re-allow building on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013.
In commit 450ee7012 I supposed that all platforms we now care about have
snprintf(), since that's required by C99. Turns out that Microsoft did
not get around to adding that until VS2015. We've dropped support for
VS2013 as of HEAD (cf 6203583b7
Re-allow building on Microsoft Visual Studio 2013.
In commit 450ee7012 I supposed that all platforms we now care about have
snprintf(), since that's required by C99. Turns out that Microsoft did
not get around to adding that until VS2015. We've dropped support for
VS2013 as of HEAD (cf 6203583b7
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Fix alter_table.sql test case to test what it claims to.
The stanza "SET STORAGE may need to add a TOAST table" does not
test what it's supposed to, and hasn't done so since we added
the ability to store constant column default values as metadata.
We need to use a non-constant default to get the e
Support writing "CREATE/ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE DEFAULT".
We already allow explicitly writing DEFAULT for SET COMPRESSION,
so it seems a bit inflexible and non-orthogonal to not have it
for STORAGE.
Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caj7c6tmx9ui+6y3tqfaxjyvpzybukvqhqbvdj8o
14 matches
Mail list logo
