Clean up MergeAttributesIntoExisting()
Make variable naming clearer and more consistent. Move some variables
to smaller scope. Remove some unnecessary intermediate variables.
Try to save some vertical space.
Apply analogous changes to nearby MergeConstraintsIntoExisting() and
RemoveInheritance(
Add some const qualifiers
There was a mismatch between the const qualifiers for
excludeDirContents in src/backend/backup/basebackup.c and
src/bin/pg_rewind/filemap.c, which led to a quick search for similar
cases. We should make excludeDirContents match, but the rest of the
changes seem like a go
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Fix another bug in parent page splitting during GiST index build.
Yet another bug in the ilk of commits a7ee7c851 and 741b88435. In
741b88435, we took care to clear the memorized location of the
downlink when we split the parent page, because splitting the parent
page can move the downlink. But we
Clean up MergeCheckConstraint()
If the constraint is not already in the list, add it ourselves,
instead of making the caller do it. This makes the interface more
consistent with other "merge" functions in this file.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-
MergeAttributes() and related variable renaming
Mainly, rename "schema" to "columns" and related changes. The
previous naming has long been confusing.
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/52a125e4-ff9a-95f5-9f61-b87cf447e4da%40eisentraut.org
Branch
--
master
Details
doc: PG 16 relnotes: clarify "relation" segsize mention
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 16 only
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e391939b76f941544fdb
doc: correct reference to pg_relation in comment
Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: master
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/441bbd29fe751a01b6c74cc53f2e7b223
pgbench: Improve help output of -I option
Add a description of the step letters to the --help output.
Author: Gurjeet Singh
Reviewed-by: Tristen Raab
Discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABwTF4Xbc=K4tFj5Znc8jx0GCufQa577GCDsWD7=71qdnue...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/17cd48d
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/28919a0
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1b5a00450acb34
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/e1ae79b
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9ac7fa2
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3d398ae
doc: mention GROUP BY columns can reference target col numbers
Reported-by: hape
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3a9a1b8
pgrowlocks: change lock mode output labels for consistency
Change "Share" to "For Share" and "Key Share" to "For Key Share" for
consistency with other lock mode labels.
BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY BREAK
Reported-by: David Cook
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CA+dNBPNBf+FCEwohe7SH1tSks0R_G4F=tuvM=
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: pg_upgrade, clarify standby servers must remain running
Also mention that mismatching primary/standby LSNs should never
happen.
Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cam527d8heqkjg5vrvju3xjsqxg41ufuyabd9qzccdaxnpbr...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3fea85469
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/cf
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7c
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/14
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/aa
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/95
doc: clarify the behavior of unopenable listen_addresses
Reported-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/cabwtf4wypd9ov-kcsq1+j+zj5wydqlxquy6lu2cvb-y7ptp...@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/36
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdi
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify handling of time zones with "time with time zone"
Reported-by: [email protected]
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/c
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_11_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a4a8c0de2b8120b909510eb
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_16_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2ef5c5e736b8b13d777d5ec
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_12_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9a59ff483e2c46ad24f23d1
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_15_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c3f7e91a191bfce657ed27e
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_14_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/aa7d0b6cf954c53e9e7f446
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
REL_13_STABLE
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/c8afad9e634979ed0ba411c
doc: clarify the effect of concurrent work_mem allocations
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Backpatch-through: 11
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5f567b3c35c10668f62839a4a6d111
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
Stop using "-multiply_defined suppress" on macOS.
We started to use this linker switch in commit 9df308697 of
2004-07-13, which was in the OS X 10.3 era. Apparently it's been a
no-op since around OS X 10.9. Apple's most recent toolchain version
actively complains about it, so it's time to get ri
unaccent: Tweak value of PYTHON when building without Python support
As coded, the module's Makefile would fail to set a value for PYTHON as
it checked if the variable is defined. When compiling without
--with-python, PYTHON is defined and set to an empty value, so the
existing check is not able
unaccent: Tweak value of PYTHON when building without Python support
As coded, the module's Makefile would fail to set a value for PYTHON as
it checked if the variable is defined. When compiling without
--with-python, PYTHON is defined and set to an empty value, so the
existing check is not able
unaccent: Tweak value of PYTHON when building without Python support
As coded, the module's Makefile would fail to set a value for PYTHON as
it checked if the variable is defined. When compiling without
--with-python, PYTHON is defined and set to an empty value, so the
existing check is not able
unaccent: Tweak value of PYTHON when building without Python support
As coded, the module's Makefile would fail to set a value for PYTHON as
it checked if the variable is defined. When compiling without
--with-python, PYTHON is defined and set to an empty value, so the
existing check is not able
unaccent: Tweak value of PYTHON when building without Python support
As coded, the module's Makefile would fail to set a value for PYTHON as
it checked if the variable is defined. When compiling without
--with-python, PYTHON is defined and set to an empty value, so the
existing check is not able
61 matches
Mail list logo