[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert updatable views

2009-01-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Log Message: --- Revert updatable views Modified Files: -- pgsql/doc/src/sgml: catalogs.sgml (r2.191 -> r2.192) (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml?r1=2.191&r2=2.192) intro.sgml (r1.33 -> r1.34) (http:

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warnings in new win32 locale code when building

2009-01-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
Log Message: --- Silence compiler warnings in new win32 locale code when building on mingw. ITAGAKI Takahiro Modified Files: -- pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt: pg_locale.c (r1.47 -> r1.48) (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.

2009-01-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
Log Message: --- Silence compiler warning on win32. ITAGAKI Takahiro Modified Files: -- pgsql/src/test/regress: pg_regress.c (r1.57 -> r1.58) (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c?r1=1.57&r2=1.58) -- Sent via pgsql

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.

2009-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
m...@postgresql.org (Magnus Hagander) writes: > pgsql/src/test/regress: > pg_regress.c (r1.57 -> r1.58) > > (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c?r1=1.57&r2=1.58) Surely this patch is wrong. It is suppressing, not fixing, a critical war

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.

2009-01-27 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > m...@postgresql.org (Magnus Hagander) writes: >> pgsql/src/test/regress: >> pg_regress.c (r1.57 -> r1.58) >> >> (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c?r1=1.57&r2=1.58) > > Surely this patch is wrong. It is suppressing,

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.

2009-01-27 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Surely this patch is wrong. It is suppressing, not fixing, a critical >> warning about a datatype mismatch. > You mean the signed vs unsigned part? Other than that, int and dword are > always the same on win32... Hmm, need more caffeine I guess. I w