Fix assertion failure due to over-eager code deduplication.
In the previous commit I'd made MemoryContextContains() use
GetMemoryChunkContext(), but that causes trouble when the passed
pointer isn't allocated in any memory context - that's probably
something we shouldn't do, but the previous commi
Reduce size of common allocation header.
The new slab allocator needs different per-allocation information than
the classical aset.c. The definition in 58b25e981 wasn't sufficiently
careful on 32 platforms with 8 byte alignment, leading to buildfarm
failures. That's not entirely easy to fix by j
Overhaul memory management README.
The README was written as a "historical account", and that style
hasn't aged particularly well. Rephrase it to describe the current
situation, instead of having various version specific comments.
This also updates the description of how allocated chunks are
ass
On 2017-02-28 23:08:32 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/27/17 07:01, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Make useful infrastructure from aset.c generally available.
>
> It looks like something in this patch set has upset the test_decoding
> check on several build farm machines (all arm or powerpc it see
On 2/27/17 07:01, Andres Freund wrote:
> Make useful infrastructure from aset.c generally available.
It looks like something in this patch set has upset the test_decoding
check on several build farm machines (all arm or powerpc it seems). Any
ideas?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2
Use proper enum constants for LockWaitPolicy
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/eb75f4fced77e108393f18425ec3f7aba2e70a9d
Modified Files
--
src/backend/executor/execReplication.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
S
Fix incorrect variable datatype
Both datatypes map to the same underlying one which is why it still
worked, but we should use the correct type.
Author: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/71b33680883a359bb75fdb40d64b11d284b73d5c
Fix incorrect variable datatype
Both datatypes map to the same underlying one which is why it still
worked, but we should use the correct type.
Author: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Branch
--
REL9_6_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/965956a03305fb8517c584d37515344f4101
Fix incorrect variable datatype
Both datatypes map to the same underlying one which is why it still
worked, but we should use the correct type.
Author: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Branch
--
REL9_5_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2cc16380a46d4c2103aa6caa6aaf0170863f8509
Fix incorrect variable datatype
Both datatypes map to the same underlying one which is why it still
worked, but we should use the correct type.
Author: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/016c9908347ed2ba7b9d7101c858ea7730b6c0b0
Modifi
10 matches
Mail list logo