Reduce wal_retrieve_retry_interval in applicable TAP tests.
By default, wal_retrieve_retry_interval is five seconds, which is far
more than is needed in any of our TAP tests, leaving the test cases
just twiddling their thumbs for significant stretches. Moreover,
because it's so large, we get basi
Reduce wal_retrieve_retry_interval in applicable TAP tests.
By default, wal_retrieve_retry_interval is five seconds, which is far
more than is needed in any of our TAP tests, leaving the test cases
just twiddling their thumbs for significant stretches. Moreover,
because it's so large, we get basi
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Don't lose walreceiver start requests due to race condition in postmaster.
When a walreceiver dies, the startup process will notice that and send
a PMSIGNAL_START_WALRECEIVER signal to the postmaster, asking for a new
walreceiver to be launched. There's a race condition, which at least
in HEAD is
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Ignore old stats file timestamps when starting the stats collector.
The stats collector disregards inquiry messages that bear a cutoff_time
before when it last wrote the relevant stats file. That's fine, but at
startup when it reads the "permanent" stats files, it absorbed their
timestamps as if
Reduce pg_ctl's reaction time when waiting for postmaster start/stop.
pg_ctl has traditionally waited one second between probes for whether
the start or stop request has completed. That behavior was embodied
in the original shell script written in 1999 (commit 5b912b089) and
I doubt anyone's ques
Improve wait logic in TAP tests for streaming replication.
Remove hard-wired sleep(2) delays in 001_stream_rep.pl in favor of using
poll_query_until to check for the desired state to appear. In addition,
add such a wait before the last test in the script, as it's possible
to demonstrate failures
Avoid useless "x = ANY(ARRAY[])" test for empty partition list.
This arises in practice if the partition only admits NULL values.
Jeevan Ladhe
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/caogct0ochrn--uuqh6wg6z8+nxncwj+2q-uhnk4koandrrx...@mail.gmail.com
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.po
Minor code review for parse_phrase_operator().
Fix its header comment, which described the old behavior of the
phrase distance operator; we missed updating that in commit 028350f61.
Also, reset errno before strtol() call, to defend against the possibility
that it was already ERANGE at entry. (Th
Minor code review for parse_phrase_operator().
Fix its header comment, which described the old behavior of the
phrase distance operator; we missed updating that in commit 028350f61.
Also, reset errno before strtol() call, to defend against the possibility
that it was already ERANGE at entry. (Th
Consistently use () for function calls in release notes
Branch
--
master
Details
---
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/59cd3987afd61191483a4cfe8f6a0abfb8c878d6
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/release-10.sgml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
