Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

On 24/09/15 22:41, Geoff Winkless wrote: On 24 September 2015 at 11:33, Gavin Flower <mailto:gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz>>wrote: An example from a book on PostgreSQL server programming that I'm working through (Note that it is obviously awkward to write with gender

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

An example from a book on PostgreSQL server programming that I'm working through (Note that it is obviously awkward to write with gender pronouns when gender is irrelevant, note the "he she" in one place and "he/she" in another!): "If the user is a superuser, then he she has permission to

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

On 22/09/15 22:17, Geoff Winkless wrote: On 22 September 2015 at 10:52, Gavin Flower <mailto:gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz>>wrote: On 22/09/15 21:33, Geoff Winkless wrote: ​ ​ Without wanting to get into a grammar war, ​I'm not so sure I agree that it

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

On 22/09/15 21:33, Geoff Winkless wrote: On 22 September 2015 at 09:28, Albe Laurenz >wrote: Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Erik Rijkers mailto:e...@xs4all.nl>> wrote: >> I think this compulsive 'he'-avoiding is making the te

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Include planning time in EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.

On 03/02/14 09:44, Peter Geoghegan wrote: On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Perhaps s/Total runtime/Execution time/ ? +1 If the planning was ever made into a parallel process, then 'elapsed time' would be less than the 'processor time'. So what does 'Execution time' mean?