On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 16:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-05-24 at 20:41 +, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 24 May 2011 20:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm. We intentionally did not include the local case, because there
>> > really aren't any usecases for it. It seems you disagree?
On tis, 2011-05-24 at 20:41 +, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 20:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> > Hmm. We intentionally did not include the local case, because there
> > really aren't any usecases for it. It seems you disagree? ;)
> >
>
> pg_basebackup?
Exactly
--
Sent via pgsql-comm
On 24 May 2011 20:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Hmm. We intentionally did not include the local case, because there
> really aren't any usecases for it. It seems you disagree? ;)
>
pg_basebackup?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
Enterp
Hmm. We intentionally did not include the local case, because there
really aren't any usecases for it. It seems you disagree? ;)
//Magnus
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Add a "local" replication sample entry
>
> Also adjust alignment a bit to distinguish commented out f
Add a "local" replication sample entry
Also adjust alignment a bit to distinguish commented out from comment.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f50655900a865d65d17bb79f57f1d8c48b1cb266
Modified Files
--
src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample
