[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_6_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9937088b26eef7bbe27a9bb5f497a

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- master Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/23ed2ba8121178474f8c51774c6c258cb165

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_5_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/f5d177632e6622676ff7fe49962a7

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_1_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/aee5eb8300ac8e37e5f32b87b499e

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_2_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0d386bdb6c65c251f9a5952474555

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_3_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4d6c7599b65b6bbd2357883662ea6

[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update.

2016-10-19 Thread Tom Lane
Another portability fix for tzcode2016g update. clang points out that SIZE_MAX wouldn't fit into an int, which means this comparison is pretty useless. Per report from Thomas Munro. Branch -- REL9_4_STABLE Details --- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/65935033d64cb5ad51f7e5967860d