Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:57:47PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fix building of large (bigger than shared_buffers) hash indexes.
> Do we have any way of helping people find out if they need to recreate
> their hash indexes?
I do not think that's much of an issue. The failur
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Do we have any way of helping people find out if they need to recreate
> their hash indexes?
No, but I don't think that it's especially needed. It ought to be
completely obvious when the problem arises, because the resulting
index is total g
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:57:47PM +, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fix building of large (bigger than shared_buffers) hash indexes.
>
> When the index is predicted to need more than NBuffers buckets,
> CREATE INDEX attempts to sort the index entries by hash key before
> insertion, so as to reduce thrashi
Fix building of large (bigger than shared_buffers) hash indexes.
When the index is predicted to need more than NBuffers buckets,
CREATE INDEX attempts to sort the index entries by hash key before
insertion, so as to reduce thrashing. This code path got broken by
commit 9f03ca915196dfc8, which ove
Fix building of large (bigger than shared_buffers) hash indexes.
When the index is predicted to need more than NBuffers buckets,
CREATE INDEX attempts to sort the index entries by hash key before
insertion, so as to reduce thrashing. This code path got broken by
commit 9f03ca915196dfc8, which ove
