Log Message:
---
Modified the Stackbuilder to raise a UAC in case non-administrative user
launches the application
Modified Files:
--
wizard:
CMakeLists.txt (r1.27 -> r1.28)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/stackbuilder/wizard/CMakeLists.txt?r1
Log Message:
---
Improve error messages.
Modified Files:
--
wizard:
StackBuilder.cpp (r1.16 -> r1.17)
(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/stackbuilder/wizard/StackBuilder.cpp?r1=1.16&r2=1.17)
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-commi
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was removed.
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Just so people don't panic - this is me testing the policy script :-)
//Magnus
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:31, wrote:
> Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
>
> View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
> --
> Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-commi
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was created.
View: http://git.postgresql.org/pg/shortlog/refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Branch refs/heads/REL9_7_STABLE was removed.
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
Protect pg_stat_reset_shared() against NULL input
Per bug #6082, reported by Steve Haslam
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3ec6e00ece5fc7483f8890306005f97a2c640861
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c | 14 +++
Protect pg_stat_reset_shared() against NULL input
Per bug #6082, reported by Steve Haslam
Branch
--
REL9_0_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/cbfd82aad252fd86b560a7b7c3d87260a34a595e
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c | 14 +++
Protect pg_stat_reset_shared() against NULL input
Per bug #6082, reported by Steve Haslam
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/79aa44536f3980d324f486504cde643ce23bf5c6
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c | 14 +++---
Move the PredicateLockRelation() call from nodeSeqscan.c to heapam.c. It's
more consistent that way, since all the other PredicateLock* calls are
made in various heapam.c and index AM functions. The call in nodeSeqscan.c
was unnecessarily aggressive anyway, there's no need to try to lock the
relati
Grab predicate locks on matching tuples in a lossy bitmap heap scan.
Non-lossy case was already handled correctly.
Kevin Grittner
Branch
--
REL9_1_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1aa447a1e1273e51f1bb34e085c021941db86212
Modified Files
--
src/backen
Move the PredicateLockRelation() call from nodeSeqscan.c to heapam.c. It's
more consistent that way, since all the other PredicateLock* calls are
made in various heapam.c and index AM functions. The call in nodeSeqscan.c
was unnecessarily aggressive anyway, there's no need to try to lock the
relati
Grab predicate locks on matching tuples in a lossy bitmap heap scan.
Non-lossy case was already handled correctly.
Kevin Grittner
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/d9fe63acb033141be695815a8a663de8dae4f8af
Modified Files
--
src/backend/execu
Restore correct btree preprocessing of "indexedcol IS NULL" conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit 29c4a
Restore correct btree preprocessing of "indexedcol IS NULL" conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit 29c4a
Restore correct btree preprocessing of "indexedcol IS NULL" conditions.
Such a condition is unsatisfiable in combination with any other type of
btree-indexable condition (since we assume btree operators are always
strict). 8.3 and 8.4 had an explicit test for this, which I removed in
commit 29c4a
Fix outdated comment
Extracted from a patch by Bernd Helmle
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/b36927fbe922d1aac5d6e42c04eecf65bf37f5f3
Modified Files
--
src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 dele
18 matches
Mail list logo