Fix missing space in documentation
Ian Barwick
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/6d6cade05bcb68ca8677aa5502ca73274d6e4539
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Sent via pgsql-c
Fix missing space in documentation
Ian Barwick
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5c9a4a866efcc15ec041134538e01f25c2e2bd88
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Sent via
Fix missing space in documentation
Ian Barwick
Branch
--
REL9_4_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/76394810f87d3c03f8a135cc6e9801acc6b0ad8d
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Sent via
Put SSL_pending() call behind the new internal SSL API.
It seems likely that any SSL implementation will need a similar call, not
just OpenSSL.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4e86f1b16da85ba0a99c592dc7b977b3be80a483
Modified Files
--
src
Fix hstore_to_json_loose's detection of valid JSON number values.
We expose a function IsValidJsonNumber that internally calls the lexer
for json numbers. That allows us to use the same test everywhere,
instead of inventing a broken test for hstore conversions. The new
function is also used in dat
Fix hstore_to_json_loose's detection of valid JSON number values.
We expose a function IsValidJsonNumber that internally calls the lexer
for json numbers. That allows us to use the same test everywhere,
instead of inventing a broken test for hstore conversions. The new
function is also used in dat
Fix hstore_to_json_loose's detection of valid JSON number values.
We expose a function IsValidJsonNumber that internally calls the lexer
for json numbers. That allows us to use the same test everywhere,
instead of inventing a broken test for hstore conversions. The new
function is also used in dat
Fix backpatching error in commit 55c88079
Branch
--
REL9_3_STABLE
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/9e05f3b97e63c34411669aee139c4a6236c68030
Modified Files
--
src/backend/utils/adt/json.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Sent via
Move security_label test
Rather than have the core security_label regression test depend on the
dummy_seclabel module, have that part of the test be executed by
dummy_seclabel itself directly. This simplifies the testing rig a bit;
in particular it should silence the problems from the MSVC buildf
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
Guard against bad "dscale" values in numeric_recv().
We were not checking to see if the supplied dscale was valid for the given
digit array when receiving binary-format numeric values. While dscale can
validly be more than the number of nonzero fractional digits, it shouldn't
be less; that case c
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Move security_label test
>
> Rather than have the core security_label regression test depend on the
> dummy_seclabel module, have that part of the test be executed by
> dummy_seclabel itself directly. This simplifies the testing rig a bit;
>
16 matches
Mail list logo