Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Fix ExecOpenScanRelation to take a lock on a ROW_MARK_COPY relation.
ExecOpenScanRelation assumed that any relation listed in the ExecRowMark
list has been locked by InitPlan; but this is not true if the rel's
markType is ROW_MARK_COPY, which is possible if it's a foreign table.
In most (possibly
Add support for ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS ... RENAME CONSTRAINT
Also add regression test. Previously this was documented to work, but
didn't.
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/1d8198bb44e7e7e3e96d96942f642e9964111628
Modified Files
--
src/back
doc: update NUMERIC to state that only some ops are exact
Report by Tom Lane
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/278edd9ed36c7722cbae27e0e96a08964da69eb5
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 7 inse
btree_gin: properly call DirectFunctionCall1()
Previously we called DirectFunctionCall3() with dummy arguments.
Patch by Jon Nelson
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/843cd0bfe6246d94d9b34a7f36bbb76fdba87b74
Modified Files
--
contrib/btree
docs: clarify when MVCC snapshot is taken
Report by Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/66c8040d509c86fd2f215c06eb16d82e570d3fb6
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:25:50AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > regression=# create table foo();
> > CREATE TABLE
> > regression=# insert into foo default values;
> > INSERT 0 1
> > regression=# insert into foo default values;
> > INSERT 0 1
> > regression=# select * from foo;
> > --
> > (2 rows
psql: show proper row count in \x mode for zero-column output
Also, fix pager enable selection for such cases, and other cleanups for
zero-column output.
Report by Thom Brown
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/376a0c4547fe98c45476647596ce9c9b394f8415
PL/pgSQL docs: recommend format() for query construction
Previously only concatenation was recommended.
Report by Pavel Stehule
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/0e1f6d8132b4da3e0727bb4918b9ea51446a9c41
Modified Files
--
doc/src/sgml/func
Bruce Momjian writes:
> btree_gin: properly call DirectFunctionCall1()
> Previously we called DirectFunctionCall3() with dummy arguments.
This patch is entirely wrong and has broken the buildfarm.
Please revert.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing l
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > btree_gin: properly call DirectFunctionCall1()
> > Previously we called DirectFunctionCall3() with dummy arguments.
>
> This patch is entirely wrong and has broken the buildfarm.
> Please revert.
OK, done.
--
Revert commit 843cd0bfe6246d94d9b34a7f36bbb76fdba87b74
Report by Tom Lane
Branch
--
master
Details
---
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/11226e3817687fcb70fb49d75fdf592e7f3884f6
Modified Files
--
contrib/btree_gin/btree_gin.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 12
16 matches
Mail list logo