information_schema.applicable_roles behavior does not match documentation

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/infoschema-applicable-roles.html Description: The documentation for applicable_roles says: "The current user itself is also an applicable role." (see https://www.postgresql.org/docs

Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:31:46PM -0500, Jim Ryan wrote: > This looks great.  Thanks for working on it. Done. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + +

Re: Trigger behaviour not as stated

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:17:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 06:12:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Oh, I am sorry. I was focused on the first part of the sentence and > > > didn't notice your change to the second part. How is this attachmen

Re: SPI not defined.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:03:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 08:58:10PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:51:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian writes: > >

Re: Bug in pg_upgrade standby rsync doc

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:46:52PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I propse the attached patch to fix the generic syntax and the example. > I will backpatch it through 9.5. As you stated, the tablespace example > is fine. Done. Thanks for the report. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.u

Windows instructions are incomplete

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/pgupgrade.html Description: In set 9. Run pg_upgrade: It says that windows users should execute this: RUNAS /USER:postgres "CMD.EXE" This step does not work unless you create a us