On 2018-08-28 19:02:06 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Looks reasonable to me. And I definitely think we should do it -- people
> will be upgrading to 10 for years to come, so claiming it's too late is
> definitely not correct.
Please make sure to backpatch it to all branches carrying v10 release
On Aug 28, 2018, at 1:09 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:On Aug 28, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:HelloA customer of ours was taken by surprise by a change in Postgres
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Hello
>
> A customer of ours was taken by surprise by a change in Postgres 10 on a
> trial upgrade from 9.6. They were using sequences from SERIAL columns a
> little unorthodoxly, and their stuff stopped working: essentially, they
>
Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel writes:
> It seems that naming prepared statements is limited to 63 characters as per
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-SYNTAX-IDENTIFIERS
Yeah, just like every other SQL identifier in Postgres...
> The dangerous situation