Alvaro Herrera writes:
> On 2019-Nov-08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
>> definition for the first use? Works for me.
> Well, there are three uses of the word "virgin". The first is for
> "virgin user", and the patch turns that into just "u
On 2019-Nov-08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation
> > in a parenthical comment:
>
> > This is particularly handy when restoring a
> > pg_dump dump: the dump script should be restored in a
> > pristine
> On 8 Nov 2019, at 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical
> definition for the first use? Works for me.
Agreed.
cheers ./daniel
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation
> in a parenthical comment:
> This is particularly handy when restoring a
> pg_dump dump: the dump script should be restored in a
> pristine database (one where no user-defined objects ex
On 2019-Nov-08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Here's a proposed patch.
>
> I don't like this wording much, because "no user-defined objects"
> is not a sufficient specification of what we are talking about.
> You need to also capture the property that none of the system-
> defined
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Here's a proposed patch.
I don't like this wording much, because "no user-defined objects"
is not a sufficient specification of what we are talking about.
You need to also capture the property that none of the system-
defined objects have been altered. Now that we explic
> On 8 Nov 2019, at 14:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-Nov-08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> Agreed. I like your suggestion, or the inverse of it: "a database without
>> any
>> user defined objects".
>
> Here's a proposed patch.
+1, LGTM
cheers ./daniel
On 2019-Nov-08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Agreed. I like your suggestion, or the inverse of it: "a database without any
> user defined objects".
Here's a proposed patch.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training &
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 22:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> On 2019-Nov-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and
>>
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/app-pgrestore.html
Description:
Hi,
I have one question about pg_restore tool, tables in the DB is not available
after pg_restore. Even if the user is still the owner of table after
rest
10 matches
Mail list logo
