The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/plpgsql-trigger.html
Description:
I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to put a totally generic auditing
function into the documentation e.g.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION zz_audit_() RET
po 16. 12. 2019 v 12:12 odesílatel PG Doc comments form <
nore...@postgresql.org> napsal:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/plpgsql-trigger.html
> Description:
>
> I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to put a tota
Pavel Stehule writes:
> po 16. 12. 2019 v 12:12 odesílatel PG Doc comments form <
> nore...@postgresql.org> napsal:
>> I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to put a totally generic auditing
>> function into the documentation e.g.
>> [ snip ]
> Just few points to this code
I agree this code co
> On 16 Dec 2019, at 20:27, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> .. maybe that is just more
> evidence that a well-written example would be helpful?
I think thats the key takeaway here. +1 on the gist of the suggestion that
started this thread.
cheers ./daniel
Dne po 16. 12. 2019 20:28 uživatel Tom Lane napsal:
> Pavel Stehule writes:
> > po 16. 12. 2019 v 12:12 odesílatel PG Doc comments form <
> > nore...@postgresql.org> napsal:
> >> I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile to put a totally generic
> auditing
> >> function into the documentation e.g.
