Re: your mail

2020-08-25 Thread mahammad shoyab
Thank you for your response. On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, 07:29 Michael Paquier, wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:21:28AM +0530, mahammad shoyab wrote: > > Hi please release me from this group > > It is possible to manage your subscriptions to the PostgreSQL > community mailing lists using your commu

Re: initdb - creating clusters

2020-08-25 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 18:34, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:40:59AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 21 Jul 2020, at 02:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 03:25:14PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: looking. For instance the documentation

Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

2020-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:44:03PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:01:00PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Sure, I can wait. Is this the only place where it would make sense? > > I think so. If there are other places, it does not prevent improving > what we already kno

Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?

2020-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.: $ cd doc/src/sgml/ $ cat *.sgml */*.sgml | egrep -c '(e\.g\.|i\.e\.),' 255 $ cat *.sgml */*.sgml | egrep -c '(e\.g\.|i\.e\.)[^,:]' 87 I removed the colon because using a trailing colon is alw

Re: Procedures

2020-08-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2020-08-24 18:00, Bruce Momjian wrote: -command, a procedure is called explicitly using -the statement. +command, a procedure is called in isolation using +the command. If the CALL command is not +part of an explicit transaction, a procedure can commit, rollback, +an

Re: ALTER SYSTEM between upgrades

2020-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:58, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I am creating a new thread to discuss the question raised by Alvaro of > > how many ALTER SYSTEM settings are lost during major upgrades. Do we > > properly document that u

Re: Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?

2020-08-25 Thread Erik Rijkers
On 2020-08-25 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote: We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.: [..] Virtually all American style guides recommend to follow both “i.e.” and “e.g.” with a comma (just like if “that is” and “for example” were used instead), so the very same

Re: Procedures

2020-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:38:11PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2020-08-24 18:00, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > -command, a procedure is called explicitly using > > -the statement. > > +command, a procedure is called in isolation using > > +the command. If the CALL command is n

Re: Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?

2020-08-25 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.: > This summarizes the recommended behavior: > https://jakubmarian.com/comma-after-i-e-and-e-g/ > In British English, “i.e.” and “e.g.” are not followed by a comma, so > the first example abov

Re: Add comma after e.g. and i.e.?

2020-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:10:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.: > > > This summarizes the recommended behavior: > > https://jakubmarian.com/comma-after-i-e-and-e-g/ > > In British English, “i.e.” and “e.

Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

2020-08-25 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On 2020-Aug-25, Michael Paquier wrote: > I think so. If there are other places, it does not prevent improving > what we already know needs improvement. > > FWIW, the layout I was thinking about is something like the patch > attached. This looks to me enough of an improvement that I +1 it, and y

Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

2020-08-25 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > On 2020-Aug-25, Michael Paquier wrote: >> FWIW, the layout I was thinking about is something like the patch >> attached. > This looks to me enough of an improvement that I +1 it, and yes this is > what I was imagining also. I think it's a good idea too. > (With the non-

Re: ALTER SYSTEM between upgrades

2020-08-25 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 25 Aug 2020, at 21:30, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:58, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> >>> I am creating a new thread to discuss the question raised by Alvaro of >>> how many ALTER SYSTEM settings are lost

Re: Create a Foreign Table for PostgreSQL CSV Logs

2020-08-25 Thread Николай Чадаев
Thank You Oleg. A simple example is extremely important and necessary.I will wait for this example. -- Nick Chadaev   +7(916)175-3061  +7(958)820-797524.08.2020, 18:38, "Олег Самойлов" :  24 авг. 2020 г., в 18:07, Bruce Momjian написал(а):  On Mon, Aug 2

Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?

2020-08-25 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:17:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> (With the non-website stylesheet, as in the screenshot you showed, the >> table looks somewhat crammed and visually unappealing; but the website >> stylesheet looks pleasing enough. Screenshot attached.) Right,