Hello Thomas,
22.10.2021 06:59, Thomas Munro wrote:
> That
> second patch included exactly such a documentation adjustment, and an
> error message too (the idea was to reject that combination on Linux
> but allow it on AIX). Here are those bits, extracted.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-i
On 2021-Oct-22, Kevin Sweet wrote:
>The bugs team agreed that it's a bug. The documentation accurately
>represents the buggy code. I thought you might want to update the doc
>when the bug is fixed.
It looks like the bug and the docs have both been fixed for months. I
just somehow fai
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, at 12:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Oct-19, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 05:15:59PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > I agree that it might surprise an user and it would be good to document
> > > it.
> > > However, it does not belong to the d
On 2021-Jul-29, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/datatype-numeric.html says that the range
> of a numeric type integer is -2147483648 to +2147483647 but
> PGTYPESnumeric_to_int considers -2147483648 (a perfectly valid 32-bit
> integer) to be invalid because it compa
