Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This is a very good point. I have studied the issue and created the attached
> patch to document Oracle-compatibility mode.
Hi Bruce, thank you for writing the document.
I checked it and I'm very glad!
Regards,
Takeshi Ideriha
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Shay Rojansky wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I was trying to understand what - if any - are the guarantees with regards
> to ordering for combining queries (UNION/UNION ALL/...). From this
> message[1], it seems that UNION ALL does preserve the ordering of the
> operand q
Greetings.
I was trying to understand what - if any - are the guarantees with regards
to ordering for combining queries (UNION/UNION ALL/...). From this
message[1], it seems that UNION ALL does preserve the ordering of the
operand queries, whereas UNION does not (presumably neither do INTERSECT,
I
