> On 10 May 2023, at 17:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
>> mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
>> signature tables rely on that. macOS switched to mandoc in v11 I
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
> I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
> mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
> signature tables rely on that. macOS switched to mandoc in v11 I think, but I
> don't have an older box handy to
> On 9 May 2023, at 17:14, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
> Note that formatting instructions (".PP") show in the output.
I took a look at this using macOS as the initial testbed; the TLDR is that
mandoc doesn't support macros in tables, and our single-column function
signature tables rely on that.
