Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history

2023-06-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 07:36:46AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/history.html > Description: > > Hi, > > In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/history.html it is written

Re: large scale reliable software system

2023-06-21 Thread B M
Thank you all. I will follow your advices and directions On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:17 PM Erik Wienhold wrote: > I recommend posting this to pgsql-admin or pgsql-general instead of > pgsql-docs > to get more responses. Besides that, pgsql-docs is for discussions on the > Postgres docs. > > > On

Re: large scale reliable software system

2023-06-21 Thread Erik Wienhold
I recommend posting this to pgsql-admin or pgsql-general instead of pgsql-docs to get more responses. Besides that, pgsql-docs is for discussions on the Postgres docs. > On 21/06/2023 18:52 CEST B M wrote: > > I would like to know your advices to develop a large scale reliable software > system

Re: large scale reliable software system

2023-06-21 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 6/21/23 12:52 PM, B M wrote: Dear all, After greeting, I taught PostgreSQL myself and developed a small scale experimentalsoftware system using PostgreSQL in the back-end. I would like to know your advices to develop a large scale reliable software system using PostgreSQL in the

large scale reliable software system

2023-06-21 Thread B M
Dear all, After greeting, I taught PostgreSQL myself and developed a small scale experimental software system using PostgreSQL in the back-end. I would like to know your advices to develop a large scale reliable software system using PostgreSQL in the back-end, through which i can share the

Re: [PATCH] Attempt to clarify example of serialization anomaly

2023-06-21 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 20:01 -0700, Will Mortensen wrote: > Rebased on master and updated the wording in several places. All > feedback is appreciated. :-) > > I now see how to link to the wiki from the docs. I guess I numbered > the transactions differently than the wiki's version though; I can >