Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations

On Saturday, September 30, 2023, PG Doc comments form < nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for > GRANTED > BY clause. > > As the doc says read the grant page for more detailed information. Repeating everything here was deemed redund

Re: missing GRANTED BY explanations

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:56 PM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-revoke.html > Description: > > Hi, > In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for > GRANTED >

Re: Not clear spelling about transaction

On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html > Description: > > >No committed transactions will be lost > > Hello. It is not clear to me. Did

missing GRANTED BY explanations

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/sql-revoke.html Description: Hi, In the documentation for revoke command, there is no description for GRANTED BY clause. please explain that what will happen when using this clause in revo

Not clear spelling about transaction

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html Description: >No committed transactions will be lost Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean: Not committed transactions will be lost Or None of committed tra