Bruce Momjian writes:
> Agreed, updated patch attached.
WFM.
regards, tom lane
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:26 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:27:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > > Or just the bit more verbose “user running the initdb command” and
> don’t
> > > bother giving it a label, which is basically the approach used in
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:27:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > Or just the bit more verbose “user running the initdb command” and don’t
> > bother giving it a label, which is basically the approach used in the
> > description for initdb anyway.
>
> Or if you want a fe
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> I see where you are coming from but I think the word “need” is actual
> problem and it has to go. We use the phrase “escapes satisfying” in the
> subsequent sentence and should use it here too.
Meh. I don't like the "escapes" construction too much; I think it's
mor
On Monday, January 8, 2024, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-constraints.html
> Description:
>
> Dear postgres Team,
>
> I happened to have stumbled across a tricky to read sentence i
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-constraints.html
Description:
Dear postgres Team,
I happened to have stumbled across a tricky to read sentence in Ch. 5.45
'Foreign Keys' (Postgres Version 15).
The original senten
