Thanks Tom!
True it is that is perfectly valid English. However, that interpretation might
not result trivial to us non-native English speakers.
Would be great if at some point it could be changed to make it clearer.
BTW, it also appears in the definition of the pg_stats_ext_exprs system view.
My bad. Misunderstood this when I read it. It's completely correct the way it
is.
Thanks,
Nacho
From: Laurenz Albe
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 2:06 PM
To: Nacho Alonso Portillo ;
pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Definition of random_p
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/mvcc-intro.html
Description:
There really needs to be an explicit warning that the following is invalid
in normal read committed mode:-
select foo into f from bar where id=1;
f = f + 123;
