On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:07:07AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:42:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm kind of inclined to not document this weirdness. I especially
> > don't think it's worth giving an example that neither explains the
> > "disregarded" bit nor highligh
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:42:09AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm kind of inclined to not document this weirdness. I especially
> don't think it's worth giving an example that neither explains the
> "disregarded" bit nor highlights the dependency on L being given.
I retract my doc patch for this.
Hello,
for a partitioned table, it should be mentioned in the documentation that
currently the drop will also silently
drop all the partitions underneath.
By the way, it's a pity that "cascade" is not considered to be used in such a
case.
Regards
Gilles
