You are correct, that is where I made the mistake.
Thank you for the clarification; I understand much better now and the behavior
we experienced makes sense with the correct reading of the documentation.
Daniel Bickler
From: Laurenz Albe
Date: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 at 2:17 PM
To: Daniel Bic
Thank you for the prompt response, I’m probably misreading the documentation
and how it relates to the example we ran into.
The way I interpreted the documentation, the example I ran into was a false
negative according to the definition of a serialization anomaly, because it’s
serial in one ord
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 11:39, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> > On 29 Oct 2024, at 23:36, David Rowley wrote:
> > Do you have access to make this change? I think it needs to go into
> > https://www.postgresql.org/media/css/main.css
>
> I have a pgweb commitbit so if you roll a patch for it I can ta
On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 18:41 +, Daniel Bickler wrote:
> The way I interpreted the documentation, the example I ran into was a false
> negative
> according to the definition of a serialization anomaly, because it’s serial
> in one
> ordering but not the other which seems incorrect with “all pos
On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 15:05 +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> I discovered an oddity in Serializable Transaction behavior and while
> referencing the current docs there is a possible contradiction and I'm not
> sure if this is a bug or expected behavior. At minimum there seems to be a
> contradi
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/transaction-iso.html
Description:
I discovered an oddity in Serializable Transaction behavior and while
referencing the current docs there is a possible contradiction and I'm not
sure if t
On Saturday, November 2, 2024, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-insert.html
> Description:
>
> Is my suspicion valid?
>
The presence of the returning clause and subsequent usage of t
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-insert.html
Description:
Hi,
the example found in the doc above:
WITH upd AS (
UPDATE employees SET sales_count = sales_count + 1 WHERE id =
(SELECT sales_person FROM accounts W
Hi,
Commit b4375717 introduced parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN. I've noticed
that a couple of documentation pages need to be updated accordingly. A
small patch is attached.
Thanks,
Egor
From 50dd542f113b915d52f47347efb6d7835bc6bb40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Egor Rogov
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 20
