On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:33 PM Fujii Masao
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Both the UUID data type and UUID functions pages define an index entry
> for "UUID" that points to the data type section. As a result, the index
> includes two identical entries linking to the UUID type docs,
> which seems strange.
>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:21 PM Joshua Drake wrote:
>
>
>> "We advise users who to read this chapter carefully ..." ? botched
>> surgery on this one
>>
>
> Not sure what you mean here? I reviewed the source sgml (that I modified):
>
> We advise users who to read this chapter carefully because it
>
> Overall I'm good with the attempt to trim, and most of the changes, but
> feel it tries to hard and ends up being to "matter-of-fact"; the
> conjunctions that exist make reading a wall of text easier. I agree that
> some of them could be removed as being more judgemental than mechanical.
>
Fa
I wrote:
> Another thing I just remembered (think I knew it once) is the
> behavior of the first form when low > high. It's not an error!
So concretely, how about the attached? In addition to what we
mentioned so far, I made the sentence about out-of-range cases
more explicit.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:33 PM Joshua Drake wrote:
> To make it more consumable.
>
Overall I'm good with the attempt to trim, and most of the changes, but
feel it tries to hard and ends up being to "matter-of-fact"; the
conjunctions that exist make reading a wall of text easier. I agree that
To make it more consumable.
--
- Founder - https://commandprompt.com/ - 24x7x365 Postgres since 1997
- Founder and Co-Chair - https://postgresconf.org/
- Founder - https://postgresql.us - United States PostgreSQL
- Public speaker, published author, postgresql expert, and people
be
Hi,
Both the UUID data type and UUID functions pages define an index entry
for "UUID" that points to the data type section. As a result, the index
includes two identical entries linking to the UUID type docs,
which seems strange.
I believe the UUID functions page should instead define its own in
