On Tuesday, October 7, 2025, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/queries-union.html
> Description:
>
> I'm very confused about this statement in the documentation of UNION:
> "UNION
> effect
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/app-psql.html
Description:
Hello.
I was connected to database via `psql` then I rebooted DB. I was not able to
disconnect from terminal after that. Only whole window close helped.
```
use
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:11 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> The spaces added to the end of a bpchar manually can and are considered
> “padding” - or “present but lack semantic/value significance”. The reason
> they are not padding for varchar is that such spaces are considered part of
> the st
Dear PostgreSQL Docs List
I think, I found a little typo in the Presskit 18 docs.
https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit18/en/
It says:
PostgreSQL 18 comes with HTML documentation HTML documentation as well as man
pages, and you can also browse the documentation online in both
HTML
Jeff Davis writes:
> Please take a look at the attached patch. If you'd like your name
> included in the commit, please send it as you'd like it to appear.
I don't understand why any of these variants are better than the
original wording "blank-padded". That has the non-negligible
advantage of c
On Wed, 24 Sept 2025 at 04:25, Kirk Parker wrote:
> I'm a big fan of maintenance-free functions. What would you think about
> adding the following as an alternative trigger function, or as a replacement
> for the current function, to
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.ht
> On 6 Oct 2025, at 11:05, William Sescu (Suva) wrote:
>
> Dear PostgreSQL Docs List
> I think, I found a little typo in the Presskit 18 docs.
> https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit18/en/
> It says:
> PostgreSQL 18 comes with HTML documentation HTML documentation as well as man
> p
> On 10 Sep 2025, at 09:54, Oleg wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> I have prepared a patch containing some minor inconsistencies in the
> documentation. Please, take a look.
> I will be looking forward to your feedback.
Thanks for the patch, while most of these are obvious improvements I have a few
commen
While browsing the docs I saw that the foreign key tutorial [1] uses
some lowercase keywords which are inconsistent with the rest of the
docs. The attached patch fixes that. Should be pushed to all stable
branches.
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/tutorial-fk.html
--
Erik Wienhold
>
On 2025-Oct-06, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Thanks for the report, and a very nice catch it is, turns out this duplication
> has existed in every presskit since Postgres v11..
>
> I've removed it from the v18 presskit but I opted to leave it in the older
> kits
> as they exist as historic records
> I don't understand why any of these variants are better than the
> original wording "blank-padded". That has the non-negligible
> advantage of corresponding to the type name, and furthermore
> appears in many other places in our docs and source code.
The wording for BPCHAR (not to be confused w
On Fri, 2025-10-17 at 18:18 +0400, Sergei Katkovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 4:49 PM Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> > "bpchar" and "varchar", when used without type modifier, are actually
> > identical:
> >
> > SELECT octet_length(BPCHAR 'x '),
> > octet_length(VARCHAR 'x '),
> >
On Thu, 2025-10-16 at 08:36 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> A given value has a finite length and there is just no restriction on
> what that length is. All trailing spaces in the input are considered
> padding for purposes of comparison i.e., manually padding is added by
> the user as opposed t
On Thursday, October 16, 2025, Sergei Katkovsky
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:11 PM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
> > The spaces added to the end of a bpchar manually can and are considered
> “padding” - or “present but lack semantic/value significance”. The reason
> they are not padding fo
On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis writes:
> > Please take a look at the attached patch. If you'd like your name
> > included in the commit, please send it as you'd like it to appear.
>
> I don't understand why any of these variants are better than the
> original word
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/queries-union.html
Description:
I'm very confused about this statement in the documentation of UNION: "UNION
effectively appends the result of query2 to the result of query1".
Because, if
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025, 03:38 Sergei Katkovsky wrote:
> Perhaps a better term would be
> "trailing-blanks-insignificant", with or without hyphens.
>
"Insignificant trailing blanks."
David J.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 4:49 PM Laurenz Albe wrote:
> "bpchar" and "varchar", when used without type modifier, are actually
> identical:
>
> SELECT octet_length(BPCHAR 'x '),
>octet_length(VARCHAR 'x '),
>octet_length(TEXT 'x ');
>
> octet_length │ octet_length │ octet_leng
Hi,
Attached is a doc-only fix that adds a missing closing parenthesis in
monitoring.sgml (pg_stat_progress_analyze: delay_time).
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center
v1-0001-doc-Fix-missing-closing-parentheses-in-monitoring.patch
Description: Binary data
On Thursday, October 16, 2025, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-10-16 at 08:36 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > A given value has a finite length and there is just no restriction on
> > what that length is. All trailing spaces in the input are considered
> > padding for purposes of comparison
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 5:46 PM David G. Johnston
wrote:
> "Insignificant trailing blanks."
OK, looks good to me too.
With best regards,
Sergei Katkovskii
On Friday, October 17, 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>
> I suggest the following simplification:
>
> +text, varchar,
> bpchar
>
>
Calling bpchar an alias of text/varchar does not improve matters. Sure,
the type itself doesn’t actually care about trailing spaces, but in
practice operations on
On Wed, 2025-10-15 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis writes:
> > Please take a look at the attached patch. If you'd like your name
> > included in the commit, please send it as you'd like it to appear.
>
> I don't understand why any of these variants are better than the
> original word
Hello,
> I think "blank-insignificant" is slightly better than "blank-ignoring".
Yes, I agree. And there is also "blank-agnostic" if you prefer fancy
expressions :)
> Please take a look at the attached patch. If you'd like your name
> included in the commit, please send it as you'd like it to
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 1:08 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
>
> I’m just trying to phrase the documentation for bpchar so that the “bp”,
> which stands for “blank-padded”, is justified.
That's what I thought. Yes, unfortunately, bp stands for
“blank-padded”, but this name is wrong and misleading.
25 matches
Mail list logo