On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:49:08PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I don't think we realize there was a behavioral change here. I think we
> were just trying to fix the case where the sequence maximum didn't match
> the serial maximum. I am not sure if it is worth documenting it at this
> point tho
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:05:26PM +0100, Pantelis Theodosiou wrote:
> I guess no one noticed this (for almost a year!) but I keep wondering whether
> it would be worth adding a note in the docs about the different behaviour or
> perhaps it's a bug that should be addressed.
>
> Should I post it to
I guess no one noticed this (for almost a year!) but I keep wondering
whether it would be worth adding a note in the docs about the different
behaviour or perhaps it's a bug that should be addressed.
Should I post it to the bugs list?
Best regards,
Pantelis Theodosiou
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:0
