On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 11:04 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:58 AM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
> > I think it is still a good idea to put data files and WAL on different file
> > systems. Perhaps not so much with the intention of distributing I/O across
> > different disk
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:58 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> I think it is still a good idea to put data files and WAL on different file
> systems. Perhaps not so much with the intention of distributing I/O across
> different disks, but to prevent the data files from filling the WAL disk.
>
Cannot sa
On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 11:32 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> "It is advantageous if the WAL is located on a different disk from the
> main database files. This can be achieved by moving the pg_wal directory
> to another location (while the server is shut down, of course) and
> creating a symboli
Someone pointed out this morning that we still have this in our docs:
"It is advantageous if the WAL is located on a different disk from the main
database files. This can be achieved by moving the pg_wal directory to
another location (while the server is shut down, of course) and creating a
symbol
