Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 21:24, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:08 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Daniel Gustafsson writes: >>> On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane wrote: I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below it, too. The RFC references ar

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:08 PM Tom Lane wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson writes: > > On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below > >> it, too. The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe > >> the wikipedia r

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Tom Lane
Daniel Gustafsson writes: > On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below >> it, too. The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe >> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the >> stability

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> However, I wonder if we aren't better off removing the "Useful Reading" >>> section >>> altogether? The field of crypto is continuously advancing and keeping

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> However, I wonder if we aren't better off removing the "Useful Reading" >> section >> altogether? The field of crypto is continuously advancing and keeping a >> stale >> 10+ year old list of links is unlikely

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > On 12 Feb 2024, at 13:55, PG Doc comments form > > wrote: > > > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/pgcrypto.html > > Description: > > > > I was going

Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

2024-02-13 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 12 Feb 2024, at 13:55, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/pgcrypto.html > Description: > > I was going through the links in pgcrypto documentation and I realized that > one of the