On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:35:49PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> >> They are two different things, as evidenced by there being two different
> >> sections with different section headings, that use the same fundamental
> wr
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:35:49PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> They are two different things, as evidenced by there being two different
>> sections with different section headings, that use the same fundamental
>> writing
>> rules.
> We have gotten reports about th
On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:35:49PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > On Monday, May 24, 2021, PG Doc comments form
> wrote:
> >
> > Right up to the end of section 4.1.1, is
> > almost copied word-by-word in section 4.1.2.3 - String Const
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 09:35:49PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Monday, May 24, 2021, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>
> Right up to the end of section 4.1.1, is
> almost copied word-by-word in section 4.1.2.3 - String Constants With
> Unicode Escapes.
>
>
>
> They are two dif
On Monday, May 24, 2021, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> Right up to the end of section 4.1.1, is
> almost copied word-by-word in section 4.1.2.3 - String Constants With
> Unicode Escapes.
>
>
They are two different things, as evidenced by there being two different
sections with different section h
=?UTF-8?B?5paJ6Jek55m7?= writes:
> The same paragraph followed in catalogs.sgml.
> A patch that removes it.
Hmm, the dup para as well as the one after it were inserted by
aa087ec64, and they both look out of place there. I think we
need to do more than just delete the dup; the other one needs
to
