On 12/17/24 07:40, Egor Rogov wrote:
> On 16.12.2024 21:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> On 12/9/24 19:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
Hi,
...
I've spotted another mention of B-tree being the only AM that supports
parallel builds: comment i
On 16.12.2024 21:24, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 12/9/24 19:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
Hi,
...
I've spotted another mention of B-tree being the only AM that supports
parallel builds: comment in src/backend/catalog/index.c. As this mention
is not visible to the use
On 12/9/24 19:54, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I've spotted another mention of B-tree being the only AM that supports
>> parallel builds: comment in src/backend/catalog/index.c. As this mention
>> is not visible to the users, I'd propose removing
On 12/8/24 16:00, Egor Rogov wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 17.11.2024 11:28, Egor Rogov wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> This thread doesn't seem to have attracted attention, so let me try
>> again. Two documentation pages claim that B-tree is the only access
>> method that supports parallel building, which
Hi,
On 17.11.2024 11:28, Egor Rogov wrote:
Hi everyone,
This thread doesn't seem to have attracted attention, so let me try
again. Two documentation pages claim that B-tree is the only access
method that supports parallel building, which is no longer true. I
propose to fix it in a way like
Hi everyone,
Thisthread doesn'tseem to have attractedattention, so let me try again.
Two documentation pages claim that B-tree is the only access method that
supports parallel building, which is no longer true. I propose to fix it
in a way like this:
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/d
