On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 09:02:02AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 06.09.23 03:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > There are other cases in our docs where we call something a standby and
> > mean only a physical standby/replica. Should these be clarified?
>
> When "hot standby" was added, I argued t
On 06.09.23 03:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
There are other cases in our docs where we call something a standby and
mean only a physical standby/replica. Should these be clarified?
When "hot standby" was added, I argued that it's not really a standby if
it's hot. The response was that this is so
