Re: Remaining PDF layout issues

2020-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: >> Table 27.4 is annoying: it could be made to work, just barely, with some >> hacking of the column widths and a or two. But it's not stable >> text so I have little faith in the longevity of such a solution, >> especially if people keep on inventing long wait event names. I also >>

Re: Remaining PDF layout issues

2020-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Table 27.4 is annoying: it could be made to work, just barely, with some > hacking of the column widths and a or two. But it's not stable > text so I have little faith in the longevity of such a solution, > especially if people keep on inventing long wait event names. I also > find

Remaining PDF layout issues

2020-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
There are something like 140 "exceeds the available area" PDF build warnings that will remain after the catalog-table reformatting I've proposed nearby. I've looked through these and they fall into two groups: 1. We have lots of overwidth examples. Using our standard monospaced font, A4-size