On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 03:53:31PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Fine for me as well as far as it goes. I'll go apply it if there are
> no objections.
And done.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:29:09PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/04/28 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> That does make sense. I've updated the places where I think a user
>> configuring
>> the system might conceivably infer a preference from the order, but have left
>> the other ones as i
On 2020/04/28 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
On 28 Apr 2020, at 07:22, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2020/04/28 13:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak to
the pg_bas
> On 28 Apr 2020, at 07:22, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> On 2020/04/28 13:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak
>>> to
>>> the pg_basebackup documentation. Listing
On 2020/04/28 13:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak to
the pg_basebackup documentation. Listing the user types in the reverse order
from today, putting superu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:16:41PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak to
> the pg_basebackup documentation. Listing the user types in the reverse order
> from today, putting superuser last, makes it IMO a little clearer that
Based on a recent conversation about backups I had I propose a small tweak to
the pg_basebackup documentation. Listing the user types in the reverse order
from today, putting superuser last, makes it IMO a little clearer that a
REPLICATION role is preferrable to using a superuser for running backu
