I realized later that "these data structures" was referring to
"non-balanced data structures, such as quad-trees, k-d trees, and radix
trees (tries)" from the previous paragraph, and not SP-GiST, which isn't a
data structure per se. I feel a bit silly about this confusion and am not
sure others wou
On 2023-Oct-16, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> I'm confused by this paragraph:
>
> > These popular data structures were originally developed for in-memory
> > usage. In main memory, they are usually designed as a set of dynamically
> > allocated nodes linked by pointers. This is not suitable for d
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/spgist-intro.html
Description:
I'm confused by this paragraph:
> These popular data structures were originally developed for in-memory
usage. In main memory, they are usually designed as
