On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:04 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> I tried to interest them in dropping the LMT idea altogether [1].
FWIW, I agree with you. It's meaningless because those coordinates
don't seem to be the meridians historically used for local mean time
(Trafalgar Square may be the prime meridian f
Thomas Munro writes:
> As for whether it's valid, that's coming from the IANA tz dataset. It
> has a moment that it believes standard time to have begun at each
> location, in this case:
> Z America/Mexico_City -6:36:36 - LMT 1922 Ja 1 0:23:24
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_Mexico#Histor
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 9:56 AM PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> Note how the response has a very weird timezone offset. I guess it is valid,
As for whether it's valid, that's coming from the IANA tz dataset. It
has a moment that it believes standard time to have begun at each
location, in this case
PG Doc comments form writes:
> Here is an example of a format that I don't think the documentation
> currently covers:
> janus=> set timezone to 'America/Mexico_City';
> SET
> janus=> select '1920-12-25' :: timestamptz;
> timestamptz
> --
> 1920-12-2
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/functions-formatting.html
Description:
I would like to request additional documentation on the timezone format that
can be returned.
Context: I had a problem with the HDBC-postgresql libra
