On 2021/06/30 20:59, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/05/24 11:37, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Thanks for checking the patch!
>> I thought this patch will be applied in V15 dev cycle.
>>
>> OK. I added the patch to the next CF.
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3130/
>
> I pushed the
On 2021/05/24 11:37, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Thanks for checking the patch!
I thought this patch will be applied in V15 dev cycle.
OK. I added the patch to the next CF.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3130/
I pushed the patch to 15dev. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced
On 2021/05/21 22:26, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/05/20 17:38, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/05/20 17:00, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On 2021/05/20 9:46, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/18 20:10, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> pg_stat_database.tup_fetched:
>>> Number of index
On 2021/05/20 17:38, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/20 17:00, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/20 9:46, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/18 20:10, Fujii Masao wrote:
pg_stat_database.tup_fetched:
Number of index entries returned by scans on indexes in this database
Is this the sum of
On 2021/05/20 17:00, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/05/20 9:46, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> On 2021/05/18 20:10, Fujii Masao wrote:
> pg_stat_database.tup_fetched:
> Number of index entries returned by scans on indexes in this database
Is this the sum of pg_stat_all_indexes.idx_tup_read?
On 2021/05/20 9:46, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/18 20:10, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/18 18:23, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/18 16:01, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/18 13:20, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Tid Range Scan increments the tup_returned, and
On 2021/05/18 20:10, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/05/18 18:23, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/05/18 16:01, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On 2021/05/18 13:20, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Tid Range Scan increments the tup_returned, and
pg_stat_all_tables.seq_tup_read is also
On 2021/05/18 18:23, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/18 16:01, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/18 13:20, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Tid Range Scan increments the tup_returned, and
pg_stat_all_tables.seq_tup_read is also incremented. I thought it's ok because
Tid Range Scan is like sequential
On 2021/05/18 16:01, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/05/18 13:20, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Tid Range Scan increments the tup_returned, and
>> pg_stat_all_tables.seq_tup_read is also incremented. I thought it's ok
>> because
>> Tid Range Scan is like sequential scan.
>
> Yes, you're right. One
On 2021/05/18 13:20, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/17 20:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/17 18:58, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/17 15:32, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/14 17:00, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched"
On 2021/05/17 20:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/05/17 18:58, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/05/17 15:32, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021/05/14 17:00, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched" in
On 2021/05/17 18:58, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
On 2021/05/17 15:32, Fujii Masao wrote:
On 2021/05/14 17:00, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched" in
pg_stat_database. I assumed that "tup_returned" means the number of tuples
that
On 2021/05/17 15:32, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/05/14 17:00, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched" in
>> pg_stat_database. I assumed that "tup_returned" means the number of tuples
>> that returned to clients. Of course, this
On 2021/05/14 17:00, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
Hi,
I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched" in
pg_stat_database. I assumed that "tup_returned" means the number of tuples
that returned to clients. Of course, this is wrong.
- Number of rows returned by queries in
Hi,
I worried the difference between "tup_returned" and "tup_fetched" in
pg_stat_database. I assumed that "tup_returned" means the number of tuples
that returned to clients. Of course, this is wrong.
So, why don't you describe in more detail? If my understanding is right, they
correspond to
15 matches
Mail list logo