The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-altersequence.html
Description:
Although I can see that table_name in OWNED BY clause can be optionally
schema-qualified by á…źcarefully reading "The specified table must have the
same o
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 05:58:02AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-altersequence.html
> Description:
>
> Although I can see that table_name in OWNED BY clause can be optionall
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I see what you mean. The attached patch fixes this, as well as
> adjusting the error message. I didn't see any other cases.
I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
error message is inventing a notation that we do not use in any
other error messag
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I see what you mean. The attached patch fixes this, as well as
> > adjusting the error message. I didn't see any other cases.
>
> I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
> error messag
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
>> error message is inventing a notation that we do not use in any
>> other error message.
> What do you suggest? The current message is:
>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 06:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
> >> error message is inventing a notation that we do not use in any
> >> other erro
On 2020-03-23 02:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 06:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I don't really think this is an improvement, mainly because that
error message is inventing a notation that we do
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:35:25PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-03-23 02:27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 06:20:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:05:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > I don't really think t
On 2020-03-24 21:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
That is a good point. I used CREATE VIEW as an example because that is
what the user reported, but it seems only create_view and reindexed use
a schema name qualification:
$ grep -l 'schema' *.sgml
create_view.sgml
reindexdb.sgml
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:46:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-03-24 21:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > That is a good point. I used CREATE VIEW as an example because that is
> > what the user reported, but it seems only create_view and reindexed use
> > a schema name qualification:
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo