37.10.3

2020-03-12 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/xfunc-c.html Description: There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren't you talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ?

68.2.1

2020-03-12 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/storage-toast.html Description: ALTER TABLE ... SET (toast_tuple_target = N) is not documented in "ALTER TABLE" SQL commands section.

optionally schema-qualified for table_name

2020-03-12 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-altersequence.html Description: Although I can see that table_name in OWNED BY clause can be optionally schema-qualified by á…źcarefully reading "The specified table must have the same o

Re: Move description of general lock behaviour out of the "13.3.1. Table-level Locks section"

2020-03-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 05:04:00PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/explicit-locking.html > Description: > > Hi > > The "13.3.1. Table-level Locks" subsection mentions the follow

Re: 68.2.1

2020-03-12 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 08:07 +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > ALTER TABLE ... SET (toast_tuple_target = N) is not documented in "ALTER > TABLE" SQL commands section. No, but the documentation for the SET clause references the "Storage Parameter" section of CREATE TABLE, and it is referenced the

Re: 37.10.3

2020-03-12 Thread Laurenz Albe
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:34 +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren't you > talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ? Indeed. Here is a patch for that. Yours, Laurenz Albe diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml index

Re: btree index maximum row size

2020-03-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 07:09:19PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/limits.html > Description: > > Appendix K (PostgreSQL Limits) - doesn't mention the (btree) index row size > lim

Re: btree index maximum row size

2020-03-12 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:17 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sorry for the delay in replying. We do get questions about the btree > length limit occasionally, but practically the length limit usually > isn't a problem. Technically the limitation is documented elsewhere, since it is a limitation of the