While looking at something else, I noticed that we still refer to the
"PostgreSQL FTP server" in the MSVC portion of the docs even though the FTP
server is long since gone. The attached diff changes it to refer to the
downloads section of the web site instead which seems more up to date.
--
Danie
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:36 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> While looking at something else, I noticed that we still refer to the
> "PostgreSQL FTP server" in the MSVC portion of the docs even though the FTP
> server is long since gone. The attached diff changes it to refer to the
> downloads s
> On 22 Jan 2021, at 12:51, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:36 AM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>> While looking at something else, I noticed that we still refer to the
>> "PostgreSQL FTP server" in the MSVC portion of the docs even though the FTP
>> server is long since gon
Hi,
In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/storage-page-layout.html
we can find on § 68.6.1. Table Row Layout
the Table 68.4. HeapTupleHeaderData Layout
When additionning Length of differents Fields taht are present we obtain
atotal of
4+4+4+4+6+2+2+1 = 27
What doesn't seem to fit with previou
benj@laposte.net writes:
> In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/storage-page-layout.html
> we can find on § 68.6.1. Table Row Layout
> the Table 68.4. HeapTupleHeaderData Layout
>
> When additionning Length of differents Fields taht are present we
> obtain atotal of
> 4+4+4+4+6+2+2+1 = 27
Le 22/01/2021 à 17:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
> benj@laposte.net writes:
>> In https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/storage-page-layout.html
>> we can find on § 68.6.1. Table Row Layout
>> the Table 68.4. HeapTupleHeaderData Layout
>>
>> When additionning Length of differents Fields taht are present
benj@laposte.net writes:
> Le 22/01/2021 à 17:49, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> I think you missed the point that t_cid overlays with t_xvac.
> So in fact the error (with number 27) was in the documentation for
> version before postgres 8.3.
No, the pre-8.3 docs are also correct, for their time.
> While I was working on those table changes, I had some occasions
> to want to do that sort of thing. I found that it was possible
> to do it mechanically using XML tools. Unfortunately I did not
> save my scripts, and they were just hacks anyway ;-). But you
> might be able to get somewhere wi
