The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think
we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to this?
--
Daniel Gustafsson
postgres_title.diff
Description: Binary data
On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think
> we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to
> this?
Both are very new. No objection to the change.
--
Álvaro HerreraBreisgau, Deutsc
On 3/14/23 7:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I think
we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any objections to this?
Both are very new. No objection to the change.
+1
> On 14 Mar 2023, at 13:55, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
> On 3/14/23 7:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2023-Mar-14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> The docs use PostgreSQL and not Postgres in all but two places, which I
>>> think
>>> we should change like in the attached to be consistent. Any obje
The Unique Indexes section (
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/indexes-unique.html) does not mention
the new NULLS [ NOT ] DISTINCT capability of indexes (
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-createindex.html), and it probably
should.
Specifically, it has the exact wording from previous versio