In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce
Momjian) transmitted:
> David Fetter wrote:
>> Kind people,
>>
>> I was looking over the Tutorial section, and noticed that Foreign Keys
>> is in the "Advanced" section. I believe this is a mistake, and would
>> like
Clinging to sanity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) mumbled into her beard:
> Chris Browne, could you give me a pointer to your patch so we don't
> step on each other's feet?
It was posted on the patches list on 2003-12-29...
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','cbbrowne.com'
Oops! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> David Fetter wrote:
>> > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the
>> > (IME always wrong) impression that they're optional.
>>
>>
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Ian Barwick wrote:
> attached.
>
> Ian Barwick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 4: Don't 'kil
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
>> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> David Fetter wrote:
>>> > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the
>>> > (IME al
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the
> > (IME always wrong) impression that they're optional.
>
> They *are* optional.
I disagree.
> The first chapter is about getting the data
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
Because foreign keys are part of database design 101?
Indeed, but the subject matter of chapter 2 of the tutorial is more like
introduction to databases 099. Others may rightfully claim that
transactions and views
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel that there is a very useful dividing line between chapters 2 and
> 3: chapter 2 is about getting the data in and out, to give beginners a
> feeling that the database system is working, chapter 3 is about
> refining the data structures for hig
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 12:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the (IME
> > always wrong) impression that they're optional.
>
> They *are* optional.
>
> The first chapter is about getting the data in and out. That is no
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> Because foreign keys are part of database design 101?
Indeed, but the subject matter of chapter 2 of the tutorial is more like
introduction to databases 099. Others may rightfully claim that
transactions and views are also elementary parts of database
applicatio
David Fetter wrote:
> Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the (IME
> always wrong) impression that they're optional.
They *are* optional.
The first chapter is about getting the data in and out. That is not
optional for using a database. Transactions, views, foreign key
Thanks. Applied.
---
Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> There is updated Russian translation of FAQ in attachment
>
> With best wishes,
> Victor Vislobokov
> Perm, Russia
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---
Reference Manual - psql entry:
In app-psql.html is witten:
Note: To simplify typing, commands that consists of
several words do not have to be quoted. Thus it is
fine to type \help alter table
So, I tried:
template1=# \help 'alter table'
No help available for ''alter table''.
Try \h with no arg
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20040108 07:32], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Why?
> Because foreign keys are part of database design 101?
Yes.
Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features"
Hi,
docs for 7.3 contains information how set client encoding for Windows
ODBC, but in docs for 7.4 I can't found it. Is it right?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/multibyte.html
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
---(end o
-On [20040108 07:32], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Why?
Because foreign keys are part of database design 101?
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / kita no mono
PGP fingerprint: 2D92 980E 45FE 2C28 9DB7 9D88 97E6 839B 2EAC 625B
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://diary
16 matches
Mail list logo